W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2011

Re: LC publication

From: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:01:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4E721353.3080703@oracle.com>
To: bvillazon@fi.upm.es
CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Boris, Noticed a minor issue in Figure 3: The * for the 
rr:predicateObjectMap label seems to be appearing below the label, 
instead of after-and-above the label. -- Souri.

Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
>>
>> Please substitute the column name
>> deptId
>> with
>> DEPTID
>> It has four occurrences.
>
>
> Fixed now (in v1.7).
>
> Cheers,
>     Michael
> -- 
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
> On 15 Sep 2011, at 15:52, Souripriya Das wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> Noticed another problem:
>>
>> Please substitute the column name
>> deptId
>>
>> with
>> DEPTID
>>
>> It has four occurrences.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Souri.
>>
>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History 
>>>> (Informative)", 
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history, 
>>>> is absent.
>>>
>>>
>>> Good catch, thanks, fixed!
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>     Michael
>>> -- 
>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>> Ireland, Europe
>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>
>>> On 15 Sep 2011, at 15:41, Souripriya Das wrote:
>>>
>>>> Michael,
>>>> Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History 
>>>> (Informative)", 
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history, 
>>>> is absent.
>>>> -- Souri.
>>>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Updates:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> + R2RML http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/ 
>>>>> is now pubrules compliant; I've fixed the open issues re 
>>>>> references and acks. If you do spot any typos or anomalies please 
>>>>> let me know ASAP - now is the time :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> + DM 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110915/ is 
>>>>> awaiting input (Eric, where are we with this? Please note that the 
>>>>> references to R2RML from DM should use 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/)
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope to get this out by today so that we can send the 
>>>>> publication request.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for all the hard work so far!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>     Michael
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>
>>>>> On 14 Sep 2011, at 11:15, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric, Souri,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking at the logs it looks like you've implemented the 
>>>>>> yesterday's resolutions. The next step is the publication of the 
>>>>>> LC Working Drafts. To this end, I've prepared two folders that 
>>>>>> will serve as the basis for the publication:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110914/ 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110914/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric, can you please copy your stuff in [1] so that in is 
>>>>>> self-containing and make it pub rules compliant [3] (note that in 
>>>>>> sec.3 there is still the note 'Todo (SQL datatypes): Follow 
>>>>>> ISSUE-48 referencing style used in R2RML.' - pls double check if 
>>>>>> this has been done and remove).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Souri, if you confirm that you have done everything from your 
>>>>>> side, I can take over from now (that is, clean up, copy it to [2] 
>>>>>> and make it pub rules compliant).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the URIs [1] and [2] indicate I'd like to complete this by 
>>>>>> EoB, today, so please let me know where we are ASAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next steps will be taken care of by the chairs and Ivan 
>>>>>> (transition announcement, etc.).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13 Sep 2011, at 18:37, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The minutes of today's meeting are available for review at [1]. 
>>>>>>> First, let me thank all involved people for their patience and 
>>>>>>> willingness to focus. I'm happy to say that with today's telecon 
>>>>>>> we are in Last Call:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: The WG has closed all pending issues and decides to 
>>>>>>> go LC with both R2RML and DM once the Editors have implemented 
>>>>>>> the resolutions of 2011-09-13 telecon
>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you can see, this is a conditional resolution. We need to 
>>>>>>> hear back from the R2RML and DM Editors via the mailing list (a 
>>>>>>> simple reply to this message will do) concerning the execution 
>>>>>>> of the following resolutions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-67 with going for option [1] and make a 
>>>>>>> note in the document referring to : 
>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Sep/0009.html 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Remove section 
>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-implicit-predicate-object-map that 
>>>>>>> contains syntactic sugar for single predicate-object map and 
>>>>>>> postpone ISSUE-59
>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Drop section 9 and close ISSUE-61 and ISSUE-66 with 
>>>>>>> it (maybe reuse text in a non-REC track document)
>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In addition, the following issues have been resolved as well:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in 
>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions
>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-65 based on last weeks discussion with 
>>>>>>> general agreement
>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again, thanks to all for your hard work -  next steps are for 
>>>>>>> Ivan and me to get the administrative stuff sorted ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/13-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 15:03:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:26 UTC