W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2011

Re: LC publication

From: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:41:59 -0400
Message-ID: <4E720EB7.80309@oracle.com>
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
CC: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Michael,
Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History (Informative) 
<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history>", 
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history, 
is absent.
-- Souri.

Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
> Updates:
>
>
> + R2RML http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/ is 
> now pubrules compliant; I've fixed the open issues re references and 
> acks. If you do spot any typos or anomalies please let me know ASAP - 
> now is the time :)
>
>
> + DM 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110915/ is 
> awaiting input (Eric, where are we with this? Please note that the 
> references to R2RML from DM should use 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/)
>
> I hope to get this out by today so that we can send the publication 
> request.
>
> Thanks for all the hard work so far!
>
>
> Cheers,
>     Michael
> -- 
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
> On 14 Sep 2011, at 11:15, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
>>
>> Eric, Souri,
>>
>>
>> Looking at the logs it looks like you've implemented the yesterday's 
>> resolutions. The next step is the publication of the LC Working 
>> Drafts. To this end, I've prepared two folders that will serve as the 
>> basis for the publication:
>>
>>
>> [1] 
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110914/ 
>>
>>
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110914/
>>
>>
>> Eric, can you please copy your stuff in [1] so that in is 
>> self-containing and make it pub rules compliant [3] (note that in 
>> sec.3 there is still the note 'Todo (SQL datatypes): Follow ISSUE-48 
>> referencing style used in R2RML.' - pls double check if this has been 
>> done and remove).
>>
>> Souri, if you confirm that you have done everything from your side, I 
>> can take over from now (that is, clean up, copy it to [2] and make it 
>> pub rules compliant).
>>
>>
>> As the URIs [1] and [2] indicate I'd like to complete this by EoB, 
>> today, so please let me know where we are ASAP.
>>
>>
>> The next steps will be taken care of by the chairs and Ivan 
>> (transition announcement, etc.).
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>     Michael
>>
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
>> -- 
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>
>> On 13 Sep 2011, at 18:37, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The minutes of today's meeting are available for review at [1]. 
>>> First, let me thank all involved people for their patience and 
>>> willingness to focus. I'm happy to say that with today's telecon we 
>>> are in Last Call:
>>>
>>> [[
>>> RESOLUTION: The WG has closed all pending issues and decides to go 
>>> LC with both R2RML and DM once the Editors have implemented the 
>>> resolutions of 2011-09-13 telecon
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> As you can see, this is a conditional resolution. We need to hear 
>>> back from the R2RML and DM Editors via the mailing list (a simple 
>>> reply to this message will do) concerning the execution of the 
>>> following resolutions:
>>>
>>> [[
>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-67 with going for option [1] and make a note 
>>> in the document referring to : 
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Sep/0009.html
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> [[
>>> RESOLUTION: Remove section 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-implicit-predicate-object-map that 
>>> contains syntactic sugar for single predicate-object map and 
>>> postpone ISSUE-59
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> [[
>>> RESOLUTION: Drop section 9 and close ISSUE-61 and ISSUE-66 with it 
>>> (maybe reuse text in a non-REC track document)
>>> ]]
>>>
>>>
>>> In addition, the following issues have been resolved as well:
>>>
>>> [[
>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> [[
>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-65 based on last weeks discussion with 
>>> general agreement
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> Again, thanks to all for your hard work -  next steps are for Ivan 
>>> and me to get the administrative stuff sorted ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>     Michael
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/13-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>> Ireland, Europe
>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 14:42:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:26 UTC