W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Agenda W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-11-22

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:44:22 +0100
Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7B36EEC0-0C90-4160-B8DC-3ED880B0A002@w3.org>
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
In advance for the call, and referring to item #2 below, here are some links and facts for the CR transition. The executive summary is that a "transition call" must be organized, and the request for that transition call requires some additional administration on our part.

Per process, ie:

http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfi

and

http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#transition-reqs

the group has to provide a bunch of information in writing. The second link gives you a detailed list. I think the most important points are:

- a documentation of the changes on the document since Last Call (should not be very complicated)
- "Show evidence of wide review" and "Formally address all issues" essentially means that we have to document all comments and the responses thereof, hopefully getting a reply from the commenters accepting the WG's response.

Once these information are gathered, a formal request for a transition has to be sent. More information is at:

http://bit.ly/uv2HuA

(Beware! There seems to be a bug in the XSLT script for this page, and it hangs on Firefox 8 running on Mac OS Snow Leopard:-). You have to choose the candidate rec entry on pull down list.

The rest of the steps, ie, the publications, are not significantly different than what was done before; see

http://bit.ly/vgTV9k

for those.

I also digged out an example mail for a transition request, just to give a pattern:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2011JulSep/0039.html

I hope this helps!



On Nov 21, 2011, at 14:21 , ashok malhotra wrote:

> ---------------------------------------------------------
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-11-22
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *17:00-18:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11&day=15&year=2011&hour=17&min=00&sec=0
> 
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Chair: Ashok
> Scribe: ?
> 
> 1. Admin
> 
> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of F2F meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/11/15-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
> 
> 2.  A few words about the CR process:  Ivan
> 
> 3. LC Issue 14: DM and R2RML should use same datatype mapping
> We agreed on 11/15 that both specs will contain an informative note re. user-defined
> datatypes.   The question of which canonical form to use is still open
> Richard: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0047.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0048.html
> Mariano Rodriguez: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0049.html
> Joerg Unbehauen: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0051.html
> 
> 4. Issue-72:  Bring back R2RML lookup tables
> New proposal from Richard:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/drafts/translation-tables-DERI2.html
> 
> 5. Other open issues: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/open
> 
> 6. AOB
> -- 
> All the best, Ashok
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 08:41:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 November 2011 08:41:29 GMT