W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:30:07 +0100
Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E454FC26-9115-4886-AD45-698A5C09C1E8@cyganiak.de>
To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
On 31 May 2011, at 21:18, Alexandre Bertails wrote:
> I totally agree on the fact we can act triples later. But I just want to
> point out the fact that we may have to change this solution later (for
> consistency issue for example).

Not *change*, just *add to it*, right?

>> PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-42 by not creating triples for NULL values, and adding rdfs:domain statements to the direct mapping graph. This does not preclude adding more schema triples in a future resolution.
> Because I also like to know what I am agreeing to


> can I ask you to produce a real example involving the use of rdfs:domain?

Table T with columns col1,col2,col3:

<T#col1> rdfs:domain <T>.
<T#col2> rdfs:domain <T>.
<T#col3> rdfs:domain <T>.

Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 20:30:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:23 UTC