W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft

From: Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:24:07 +0100
Cc: bvillazon@fi.upm.es, Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7527A436-40B8-4460-9E23-02E613E749DD@alexdeleon.name>
To: Robert Scanlon <rscanlon@revelytix.com>
Thanks for the comments Robert.
I changed to a different drawing tool because Violet UML wasn't exporting to PNG properly. That's why there were missing properties. 

The last version of the diagram is now available from http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3663220/RDB2RDF/R2RML.png

Regards,
Alex


On 15/03/2011, at 20:24, Robert Scanlon wrote:

> fyi, just noticed these also:
> 	• TripleMapClass should be TriplesMapClass
> 	• parentTripleMap should be parentTriplesMap
> Bob Scanlon
> Revelytix
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es> wrote:
> Hi Robert, Souri
> 
> Alex modified the image following your comments
> 
> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
> 
> Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight
> 
> Best
> 
> Boris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>> 
>> This looks very good.  Here's a few comments/suggestions:
>> 	• It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that should be an optional property, per ISSUE-23
>> 	• It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to keep those together at the end or property listings  (it's in PredicateMapClas but without a range)
>> 	• RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently missing)
>> 	• Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3 alternatives to specify a subject or object, the other 2 are at the top of the property list)
>> 
>> Bob Scanlon
>> Revelytix
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name> wrote:
>> Hi
>> I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax: http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>> 
>> Any comments/corrections?
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi Souri
>> >
>> > On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote:
>> >> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42): http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>> >>
>> >> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it ready for publishing:
>> >>      • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3
>> >>      • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about allowing complex join conditons.
>> >>      • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if any).
>> >>      • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier"
>> >> Issues to be addressed:
>> >>      • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris, could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.)
>> > I will upload the figures, once I update them.
>> > In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML specification, we will send you this figure.
>> >
>> >>      • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test case.)
>> > Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email.
>> >
>> > Boris
>> 
>> 
> 
> 



Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 23:24:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 March 2011 23:24:46 GMT