W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft

From: Robert Scanlon <rscanlon@revelytix.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:24:01 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikxNt3w+s+ZOs8fsvRWBv=vxwB-gAO6RE7GJh0M@mail.gmail.com>
To: bvillazon@fi.upm.es, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>
Cc: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
fyi, just noticed these also:

   - TripleMapClass should be TriplesMapClass
   - parentTripleMap should be parentTriplesMap

Bob Scanlon
Revelytix


On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Boris Villazón Terrazas <
bvillazon@fi.upm.es> wrote:

>  Hi Robert, Souri
>
> Alex modified the image following your comments
>
> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>
> Souri, I'll update the images, I'll try to do it by tonight
>
> Best
>
> Boris
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15/03/2011 15:59, Robert Scanlon wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
>  This looks very good.  Here's a few comments/suggestions:
>
>    - It looks like tableOwner is missing in TripleMapClass -- that should
>    be an optional property, per ISSUE-23
>    - It looks like inverseExpression is missing in SubjectMapClass and
>    ObjectMapClass; suggest inserting above graph properties to keep those
>    together at the end or property listings  (it's in PredicateMapClas but
>    without a range)
>    - RefObjectMapClass.joinCondition range is a string (currently missing)
>    - Suggest moving template up under column in SubjectMapClass and
>    ObjectMapClass, for aesthetic reasons (it's one of 3 alternatives to specify
>    a subject or object, the other 2 are at the top of the property list)
>
>
>  Bob Scanlon
> Revelytix
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Alexander De Leon <me@alexdeleon.name>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I created a UML class diagram of the R2RML syntax:
>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/R2RML.png
>>
>> Any comments/corrections?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On 15/03/2011, at 00:25, Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Souri
>> >
>> > On 14/03/2011 17:21, Souripriya Das wrote:
>> >> Latest Editors' draft (v 1.42):
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>> >>
>> >> Worked on the R2RML document to address the following issues to make it
>> ready for publishing:
>> >>      • Issue-22: added note to Sec 1.3
>> >>      • Issue-24: changed "child." to "{child.}" and added a note about
>> allowing complex join conditons.
>> >>      • Issue-26: added rr:unnamedGraph IRI as a possible value for
>> rr:graph property to indicate that the generated triples should be stored in
>> the unnamed graph (besides storing them into specified named graphs, if
>> any).
>> >>      • Issue-31: Changed "blank node label" to "blank node identifier"
>> >> Issues to be addressed:
>> >>      • Figures need to be consistent with the current text. (Boris,
>> could you please upload the latest figures or send us the pointers.)
>> > I will upload the figures, once I update them.
>> > In addition, Alex is creating a new figure that describes the R2RML
>> specification, we will send you this figure.
>> >
>> >>      • Issue-28: Needs a test case. (Boris, could you please add a test
>> case.)
>> > Done, in a previous "Test Cases" email.
>> >
>> > Boris
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 19:24:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 March 2011 19:24:41 GMT