- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:52:03 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Boris Villazón-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: rdb2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> I'd say no output file or error message. The test case could simply > have a flag to indicate that it is supposed to fail +1 In the RDFa TC I used: <expectedResults rdf:datatype="xsd:boolean">false</expectedResults> (OK, promise, I'll never use an XML syntax here again; just lazy ;) Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 22 Jul 2011, at 08:37, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 21 Jul 2011, at 21:50, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: >> but, what would be the output of these "incorrect" test cases, an >> empty result with (or without) a error message? >> One option is an empty result and an error message pointing out >> what R2RML section is wrong/missing. >> what do you think? > > I'd say no output file or error message. The test case could simply > have a flag to indicate that it is supposed to fail. > > Best, > Richard
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 07:52:33 UTC