- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:20:19 +0200
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
On 7/20/11 8:15 PM, ashok malhotra wrote: > Noted! > We will definitely discuss this, just not now :-) But what is the state of play right now? Are JDBC connection URLs part of the spec or an implementation specific item? Kingsley > All the best, Ashok > > On 7/20/2011 11:03 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 7/20/11 7:49 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>> yes, the program in the link I sent [1] is written in the XSPARQL >>> language (very similar to XQuery though). The input of the program >>> is an R2RML mapping (plus the RDB connection parameters) and the >>> output will be an RDF graph with the result of the mapping. >> Orthogonal to the context of the comment above, I really need clarity >> about "connection parameters" and R2RML. Are they important or not? >> >> Ashok, please note the above since you brought this up in one context >> and then appeared to want to put it down when I suggested doing this >> right via a superset of ODBC and JDBC. >> >> This is an important matter that needs clarification. >> > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 08:21:08 UTC