Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping]

• From: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
• Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:02:18 -0500
• To: RDB2RDF Working Group WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4D5AB19A.5020408@oracle.com>

After some discussion, we too think it makes sense to make rr:tableOwner 
optional (Issue-23 [1]). If the rest of the group thinks so, we can 
resolve it that way.
-- Souri/Seema.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/23

Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:03:31 UTC