Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] from Juan Sequeda on 2011-02-15 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from February 2011)

From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:25:44 -0600
To: RDB2RDF Working Group WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=HZjHAF5Ng1=GGgBmqh4yGYPArdkpW4F3rVotD@mail.gmail.com>

This should be on product R2RML and not direct mapping, right?

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:43 AM, RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

>
> ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/23
>
> Raised by: David McNeil
> On product: Direct Mapping
>
> Currently tableOwner is required if the tableName property is used. Change
> this so that tableOwner is optional.
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 14:26:44 UTC