W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Mandatory tableOwner property

From: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:04:53 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTikAuH8aJmU3V8fAaE6fdgtYEsjR37y9DOTtVikQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
In the R2RML spec the tableOwner property is required to qualify tableName
properties. I question this because it would seem to tie the R2RML mappings
to a specific database user. In my experience a given database schema can be
accessed via different users or installed on a separate database server
under a different user and it is desirable for a mapping to be usable
unchanged in multiple contexts. Maybe I am missing something?

For a tangible example of what I see as undesirable, notice that this test
case essentially hard-codes the user name "boricles":


Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 14:05:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:22 UTC