Re: New section on translation schemes in R2RML spec (ISSUE-61)

On Aug 23, 2011, at 01:08 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> Due to popular request, re-sending this message with updated
> subject line :-P

Thanks!

It looks good to me, particularly after David's comments were 
applied.

I think the SKOS approach is the right choice, and that broadMatch
is appropriate for the 1:N scenario.

Regards,

Ted



--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 15:49:05 UTC