Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-30 meeting 1600 UTC

Regrets from me as well,

best regards,
--
Nuno Lopes



On 30 Aug 2011, at 16:02, Percy Enrique Rivera Salas wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> Regrets for today's call.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Percy
> 
> 2011/8/30 Marcelo Arenas <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com>
> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Regrets for today (in a conference).
>> 
>> Yesterday we discussed with Juan about the direct mapping pending
>> issues, so he will be my representative in the conference call :-)
>> 
>> All the best,
>> 
>> Marcelo
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Michael Hausenblas
>> <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> Please find below the agenda for our tomorrow's conference call.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>>       Michael
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> AGENDA Teleconference
>>> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-08-30
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
>>> Local time:
>>> 
>> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=30&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0
>>> 
>>> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
>>> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
>>> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chair: Michael
>>> Scribe: Michael
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 1. Admin
>>> 
>>> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/08/23-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2. Postpone LC deadline
>>> 
>>> Discussion from last time and
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0135.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 3. R2RML
>>> 
>>> ISSUE-61 PENDING REVIEW see
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0133.html
>>> 
>>> ACTION-147 on Richard re ISSUE-29:
>>> [[
>>> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-29; all places that interpret SQL values as string
>> now
>>> use "conversion to string"
>>> ]]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [[
>>> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions
>>> ]]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [[
>>> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-51; the spec now demands that “supported RDF types”
>>> MUST raise data error, and other types MAY raise data error
>>> ]]
>>> 
>>> [[
>>> PROPOSAL: Lack of consensus on the syntax question is noted in the issue
>> box
>>> in Section 4.2, which presents both options. A decision on the question
>> will
>>> be postponed until after Last Call. This closes ISSUE-57.
>>> ]]
>>> 
>>> [[
>>> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUES 54, 56, 59, 60; they are addressed in the latest
>>> draft.
>>> ]]
>>> See
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0150.html
>>> for details re  ISSUES 54, 56, 59, and 60.
>>> 
>>> [[
>>> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-55, this could be considered for R2RML 1.1
>>> ]]
>>> 
>>> [[
>>> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-58, it is an editorial/didactic issue and can be
>>> addressed after Last Call
>>> ]]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 4. DM
>>> ISSUE-65 ... do we have a PROPOSAL for this? if yes, please reply here,
>> dear
>>> DM Editors
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 5. AOB
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>> Ireland, Europe
>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 15:36:13 UTC