- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:44:22 -0400
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
* Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> [2010-09-14 12:42+0100] > > On 14 Sep 2010, at 12:34, Harry Halpin wrote: > >However, if we wish to continue the time-honored Semantic Web > >tradition of > >having catchy names, we could call the language SQRL (squirrel), > >i.e. SQL > >to RDF Language. we should ask the jena folks if they mind http://jena.sourceforge.net/SquirrelRDF/ , but i suspect they won't. > I like it. > > The only serious issue that I see with this name is the food chain > relationship between owls and squirrels! and both emit pelets, encouraging the extension of deployed OWL code. > Richard > > > > > >A quick google search shows that this particular acronym > >is not completly colonized by some other standard or product. The main > >drawback of this name is that it may be too cute to be taken > >seriously. > > > >Anyways, food for thought. I'm happy with either name, or *any* > >name for > >that matter. > > > > cheers, > > harry > > > > > > > > > > -- -ericP
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 12:44:58 UTC