W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Last Call for Comments before FPWD

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:19:42 +0100
Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, Sören Auer <soeren.auer@gmail.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2D0E9486-0E99-47E8-A4BB-22C2D62BA0A7@cyganiak.de>
To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Alexandre,

On 24 Oct 2010, at 22:47, Alexandre Bertails wrote:
> * funny to define an RDF dataset from the SPARQL spec :-) I would
> suggest to use
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#section-Graph-syntax 
>  instead.

RDF dataset ≠ RDF graph. There is no definition of RDF dataset in RDF  
Concepts.

Best,
Richard



>
> * I think the examples should be defined in term of SQL CREATE
> statements. Even if the tabular representation is perfectly
> understandable, this is the easiest to avoid any ambiguity.
>
> Alexandre.
>
>
> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 10:11 -0700, ashok malhotra wrote:
>> Good comments from Soeren!  Editors, if you cannot take these into  
>> account before publication,
>> you may want to create issues in the text.  We can work on these  
>> later.
>> All the best, Ashok
>>
>> On 10/23/2010 8:34 AM, Sören Auer wrote:
>>> On 22.10.2010 10:04, Harry Halpin wrote:
>>>> I'd like to have when people send in FPWD comments, they cc the  
>>>> listserv.
>>>
>>> I read the document carefully and added a large number of  
>>> improvements suggestions as well as many minor corrections.
>>> Please find my changes and comments in the attached document (in  
>>> both Word and PDF version). I guess not all of the comments have  
>>> to be addressed for the FPWD.
>>>
>>> Have a nice weekend everybody,
>>>
>>> Sören
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 22:20:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:21 UTC