Re: Reverse Mapping RDF2RDF

  That's my fault ... just keeping the pot stirred!
All the best, Ashok

On 11/20/2010 2:24 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> I wonder where this agenda item comes from... I guess it was triggered by my question to Michael at the SWCG call.
>
> I did not have anything very complicated in mind, just a question... we are talking about the possibility of translating SPARQL queries to the SQL calls on-the-fly. I was just wondering whether there was a systematic consideration whether that is possible at all if I write an R2RML or use the direct mapping; if not, under which circumstances, and whether this is something that the author of an R2RML instance can influence. I saw in the inverseExpression term in R2RML; is that enough for what I meant?
>
> Maybe some sort of primer text should include more information on that.
>
> That is all...
>
> Ivan
>
> On Nov 19, 2010, at 20:20 , Juan Sequeda wrote:
>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> Per the agenda, it states:
>>
>> 4. Reverse Mapping
>> Question from Ivan re RDF2RDB (it's not in our charter, but maybe some WG
>> members plan to address this?)
>>
>> I'm curious about RDF2RDB. Could you expand on this. What are the use cases? Requirements?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Juan Sequeda
>> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
>> www.juansequeda.com
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 20 November 2010 17:42:28 UTC