- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 19:13:07 +0100
- To: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> It is standard W3C process to only list the actual editors as editors
> (i.e. usually somewhere between one and four WG members)
+1
No doubt that this is the case.
Cheers,
Michael
--
http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i
Sent from my iPhone
On 17 May 2010, at 19:06, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>
> It is standard W3C process to only list the actual editors as
> editors
> (i.e. usually somewhere between one and four WG members). Some WG
> notes
> and Recs (a minority) also list separately "authors" those that
> contributed substantial amounts of text.
>
> No W3C Recs or notes list all active WG members as editors or
> authors.
> That is always done in the acknowledgements. I asked other W3C folks
> about that today, and the answer was pretty firm that this should not
> change.
>
> cheers,
> harry
>
>
Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 18:15:12 UTC