Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/

* Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> [2010-05-10 14:29+0200]
> On 04.05.2010 8:38, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >I committed three quick revisions to capture the input from today's
> >meeting. Please review.
> 
> I don't know if my proposal was already ultimately rejected - if so
> just ignore this email. If not, I still want to suggest shifting the
> following two sections:
> 
> 2.5 UC5 - Exposing many-to-many join tables as simple triples
> 2.6 UC6 - Value-based type specification
> 
> from the Use Cases to the Requirements section for the following reasons:
> 
> * both are independent of a particular use case and domain and hence
> do not fit well in the sequence of other use cases
> 
> * they rather represent technical requirements, since they define
> what features the mapping language should comprise

done. i gave them requirements names

> Unfortunately, I'm traveling tomorrow and won't be able to join the call.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Sören

-- 
-ericP

Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 03:02:34 UTC