W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Examples in 2.6 contain redundant rr:termType declaration

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:09:35 -0700
Message-ID: <4E78C8CF.20403@oracle.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
Thank you, Richard, for kicking off the Last Call comments.
If I understand correctly, you are not saying that the examples are incorrect but,
merely, that they have lines that are unnecessary and could be removed.

This is an editorial comment and the editors will take care of it :-)
All the best, Ashok

On 9/20/2011 9:55 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> It's my pleasure to open the Last Call comment round ;-)
> This is a comment on the Last Call draft of R2RML, Section 2.6 [1]:
> The two example mappings in that section contain three instances of rr:termType. These term type declarations are unnecessary, because the default for maps that use rr:template is rr:IRI anyways. See [2] for the relevant part of the spec, and [3] for ISSUE-56 where this was tracked.
> I would suggest to remove the unnecessary declarations to keep the example minimal and to avoid distracting from the point of the example.
> (I note that this is in an informative example, so changing it won't change the R2RML language.)
> Best,
> Richard
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/#example-m2m
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/#dfn-term-type
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/56
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2011 17:15:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:45:16 UTC