Re: Comments on bNode issue within RDB2RDF mapping language

> Does this propose that blank nodes be identified by a generated  
> handle?
> I think the RDB2RDF WG would prefer generated URIs

I agree.

Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 9 Mar 2011, at 15:26, ashok malhotra wrote:

> Michael:
> The minutes say:
> ivan: RDF WG discussion of standardizing skolemized blank nodes
> ... similar issue in RDB2RDF WG
>
> Does this propose that blank nodes be identified by a generated  
> handle?
> I think the RDB2RDF WG would prefer generated URIs
>
> All the best, Ashok
>
> On 3/9/2011 7:11 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>
>> All,
>> I'd like to ask for feedback on an issue we have in the RDB2RDF  
>> mapping language [1] (background: this is triggered by a discussion  
>> we had today in the Semantic Web Coordination Group meeting. For  
>> details see the discussions referenced within the issue and also  
>> the most recent thread [2].
>> I encourage discussion on public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org and would  
>> also like to ask RDB2RDF WG members to participate, here.
>> Cheers,
>>     Michael
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/9
>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0027.html
>> -- 
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>
>>

Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 15:44:01 UTC