Ivan, Thanks for your comments. Please see my comments inline. Thanks. -- Souri. On 11/1/2010 11:41 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > In the A.2.2 example the set of triples contain > > <xyz.com/emp/7369> rdf:type xyz:emp . > > Shouldn't that be > > <xyz.com/emp/7369> rdf:type<xyz.com/emp/job/CLERK> . > > instead, per 3.1.1.9? Also, shouldn't there be an extra > > <xyz.com/emp/7369> rdf:type<xyz.com/emp/etype/PART_TIME> . > > triple? > Fixed it. We actually added two rdf:type triples: one corr to the emp:jobtype triple and the other corr to the emp:emptype triple: |<xyz.com/graph/CLERK/PART_TIME>| |<xyz.com/emp/7369>| |rdf:type| |<xyz.com/emp/job/CLERK>| |<xyz.com/graph/CLERK/PART_TIME>| |<xyz.com/emp/7369>| |rdf:type| |<xyz.com/emp/etype/PART_TIME>| > I must say I am not convinced that having rr:RDFTypeProperty is really useful. I can set the type by simply using rr:property rdf:type, so this is some sort of a shorthand for which I do not see the real necessity... > In the latest (significantly changed) Editor's draft, we have removed rr:RDFTypeProperty, among many other changes. > Ivan > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 02:22:15 UTC