- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 22:49:05 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29808 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- We say under xsl:package that the name attribute if present must be an absolute URI. We say under xsl:use-package that the name of the package must be an exact match for the value of xsl:use-package/@name using codepoint comparison. That cannot be the case if the package has no name. There is no suggestion anywhere that an unnamed package has a name equal to "". Frankly, I think there is no problem here that needs fixing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2016 22:49:13 UTC