- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 16:28:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29811 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I think there are a large number of static error conditions that are covered by the general error codes such as XTSE0010 and XTSE0020, and it's best to have a general rules describing these rather than be too fine-grained about it. Interoperability of error codes for static errors has never been a high priority, and we don't want to be over-prescriptive for example by forcing processors to check multiple static constraints in a specific order. Nor do we want to inhibit intelligent diagnostics: for example if an attribute name is misspelled, we don't want to require a processor to report that a required attribute is missing, and a disallowed attribute is present, with two different error codes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 September 2016 16:28:33 UTC