- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:24:26 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=30017 --- Comment #3 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> --- (In reply to Reece H. Dunn from comment #2) > > Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking of things like: > > invoke updating fn:put(...) > > However, if I understand correctly, the 'invoke updating' here is not needed > as fn:put has the updating annotation (and any other updating function). Right, a FunctionCall can reference a simple function or updating function, making it a simple expression or updating expression respectively. > Likewise, it would be an error to use `$f(...)` if `$f` references an > updating function -- 'invoke updating' should be used here -- That true if none of the args is "?": "If the function returned by the PrimaryExpr [of a dynamic function invocation] is an updating function, and the dynamic function invocation is not a partial function application, a dynamic error is raised [err:XUDY0038]." > and `invoke updating $f(...)` would be an error if `$f` does not > reference an updating function. No, a dynamic updating function call "can invoke either an updating function or a simple function". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 21 November 2016 20:24:36 UTC