[Bug 29701] [XP31] editorial fixes for 3.1.5.1 Evaluating Static and Dynamic Function Calls

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29701

Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdyck@ibiblio.org

--- Comment #3 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> ---
(In reply to Abel Braaksma from comment #0)
> 
> 3) We say in two occasions "or a partial application of such a function". I
> find this confusing with the term "partial function application". Though it
> is hyperlinked, I propose to change the wording to "or a partially applied
> function", which I experience as more confirmatory, and re-using the
> definition term seems appropriate here.

That wouldn't make sense. 5.b.ii and 5.b.iii are clearly mutually exclusive, so
they can't both say "or a partially applied function". The current wording
intends to describe two disjoint subsets of partially applied functions.

We could maybe say:
   "or a partially applied function created from such a function"
(though I'm not sure it's clearer than the current text).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 03:08:48 UTC