- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 02:42:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29891 --- Comment #6 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> --- (In reply to Josh Spiegel from comment #3) > How would "element(foo)" become ambiguous without reserved function names? StepExpr would derive "element(foo)" in two different ways: (1) the currently-valid way, via AxisStep -> ForwardStep -> AbbrevForwardStep -> NodeTest -> KindTest -> ElementTest, and (2) the not-currently-valid way, via PostfixExpr -> PrimaryExpr -> FunctionCall. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 02:42:53 UTC