- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:02:42 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29419 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Abel Braaksma from comment #19) > I think it was missed in the minutes, it was a decision from a while back, > captured in Bug 29552, comment #2, which says: > > "Since XPath does not define these limits, the text that resolves Bug 29419 > (which mentions the 18 digits) will be slightly and editorially adjusted. > This will be tracked in that bug itself." > > Its intent was to remove the mention of 18 digits. I asked this very question during the meeting, because I had conflicting instructions about whether it should say 18 digits or not. We discussed text that said 18 digits and accepted it after I asked that question. I think we did decide to include it. > But like you say, it is a Note anyway, and you could also argue, who in his > right mind would implement XSD 1.1 after XSD 1.0 with less support (going > from 18 to 16 digits). It seems ludicrous ;). Yes, it does sound ludicrous. > So let's leave it as is. OK. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2016 17:02:44 UTC