- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:27:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29614
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
If we're going to say anything special about atomizing an empty array, then we
also have to say something about atomizing an empty sequence, since currently
both cases rely on the reader understanding that if you do something for each
item/member, then if there are no items/members, you do nothing.
I have therefore added the notes:
<p>The result of atomizing an empty sequence is an empty sequence.</p>
<p>The result of atomizing an empty array is an empty sequence.</p>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 6 June 2016 15:27:29 UTC