W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2015

[Bug 29027] [qt3] contextDecl-022

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 02:22:26 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29027-523-lg7dkOEH5m@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29027

Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdyck@ibiblio.org

--- Comment #3 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> ---
(In reply to Michael Kay from comment #2)
> 
> I'm not sure what to make of the statement in C.2 that the initial context
> item is "overwriteable" by implementations.

It made sense when the "Default initial value" of 'context item' was 'none',
but not so much when it changed to 'the initial context item'.

I was about to describe what, to me, would be the right way to incorporate the 
initial context item into that table, when I found that I already did so
(Member-only):
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-query/2012Dec/0034.html

As far as I can tell, that message was never discussed at a meeting, and I must
have just forgotten about it. But I still think it's correct.


> If there's an initial context item declaration that gives the initial
> context item a value, I don't think we want to license implementations
> to ignore that.

Indeed, that's what we decided with respect to your bug 19267.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2015 02:22:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 5 September 2015 02:22:29 UTC