- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 16:45:43 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4378 --- Comment #17 from Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> --- > I would definitely not want to change the rule that function bodies are executed with an absent focus. OK > We should simply recategorize XPDY0002 as a type error. Why? Can you give an example of where it makes sense or is necessary to detect this condition at runtime? I think this error condition is analogous to detecting that a variable reference is not in scope and likewise should be a static error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 16:45:46 UTC