W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2015

[Bug 29263] if expression: optional else branch?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:13:09 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29263-523-XrmpisWmVb@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29263

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> ---
I think a lot of people really wish that the else clause were optional. It's
awkward in a lot of queries.

Christian's comment #2 makes sense to me, but to make this change, we would
have to get consensus VERY quickly, be sure that it is well understood, and get
test cases to illustrate it.

What would be sufficient evidence that we understand this well enough to make
the change?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 15:13:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 November 2015 15:13:12 UTC