W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2015

[Bug 28041] [XSLT30] Maps have implementation defined order, but this is not specified as such

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:14:06 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-28041-523-zLUhxPDg7W@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28041

Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl

--- Comment #2 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
It wasn't immediately obvious to me that the term set had that meaning, but it
makes sense now. 

The section in F&O you refer to starts with 

"All functions defined in this specification are ·deterministic· unless
otherwise stated. Exceptions include the following:". 

But if we look up the said functions (fn:unordered), it is deemed deterministic
and there is no notion that it is non-deterministic in regards to ordering. I
am unsure whether this is a closed set of functions or not and whether it
applies to extension functions like the ones we define in XSLT.

Does it perhaps make sense to add a line something like "this function is
non-deterministic with respect to ordering" and/or refer to that section in
F&O?.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 12:14:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 26 February 2015 12:14:12 UTC