W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > December 2015

[Bug 29346] [XP31] XPath-style currying, or the arrow operator, may require a bit more specification

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 01:31:58 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29346-523-fE6bve3O7D@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #1 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> ---
(In reply to Abel Braaksma from comment #0)
> I believe the production rules, and the accompanying text leave room for 
> a => (concat('b', ?)) being valid.
This should, of course, be a => (concat('b', ?))() to be a valid expression
here, because the production rules require the parentheses at the end.

(which makes me wonder, why do we require them? Perhaps because the EBNF would
otherwise become ambiguous?)

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 December 2015 01:32:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 18 December 2015 01:32:11 UTC