- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:16:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28526 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I think with static errors it's often hard to be precise about error codes. For example if an attribute name is misspelt then you can either report that a required attribute is missing or that a disallowed attribute is present. Similarly here: you can argue that if required="yes" the content must be empty, or you can argue that if the content is non-empty, then you can't specify required="yes". I don't think we should spend time on this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2015 13:16:24 UTC