- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:02:54 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28494 --- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- >We begin by optimizing $baseElement. This expression has static type empty sequence, therefore it optimizes itself to (). I think that's too dangerous. The user is asserting that it will be an empty sequence, but they are also asking for that assertion to be checked, in my view. This is the rule that says cardinality checks should not be bypassed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 12:03:00 UTC