[Bug 26799] [XP31] operator namespace, for compatibility and for use in higher order functions

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26799

--- Comment #4 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
There's nothing to stop you having a library of functions in a namespace of
your own choosing whose local names are the same as, or vaguely similar to, the
functions in the op: pseudo-namespace. You can have any library of functions in
any namespace you like; it's not something we could possibly ban.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 17:32:48 UTC