W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2014

[Bug 27336] New: date-094 and date-095 test family

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:29:38 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-27336-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27336

            Bug ID: 27336
           Summary: date-094 and date-095 test family
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Hardware: PC
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSLT 3.0 Test Suite
          Assignee: abel.online@xs4all.nl
          Reporter: mike@saxonica.com
        QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org

A number of problems with these new date/time tests.

date-094j says 0400-02-29 is invalid because 0400 is not a leap year. Wrong, it
is a leap year.

date-094m says -0400-02-29 is valid because -0400 is a leap year. This depends
on whether there is a year 0, which depends on whether you follow XSD 1.0 or
XSD 1.1

date-094n also depends on year 0 therefore choice of XSD version

date-094o ditto

date-094p uses a different date in the input from that expected in the output

date-094q claims 0400 is not a leap year. Oh yes it is.

date-095m - sane problem as date-094m

date-095n - sane problem as date-094n

date-095o - sane problem as date-094o

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2014 20:29:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:59 UTC