- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:45:06 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24492
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> ---
We discussed this in Prague.
There was some sentiment against requiring warnings in cases b) and c); it gets
too far into the design of the user interface. Some expressed the sentiment
that the crucial requirement was that the user be able to require a signal, as
in case a); warnings in the other cases were not essential.
MK pointed out that for Saxon, option a) requires turning optimization off; the
consequence is that when options b) and c) are chosen, the streaming analysis
will not actually be 100% compatible with the analysis prescribed by the spec.
After discussion, ABr said he was not inclined to pursue it further.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 11:45:08 UTC