- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 17:28:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27711
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
I would have some sympathy with the argument were it not that the test was
written 9 years ago, and therefore presumably many people have written test
drivers that can handle it, and these test drivers might well have to change if
it were done differently. Yes, the task of resolving module URIs is to some
extent a matter for test drivers, and therefore handling of an absent module
URI is, to some extent, testing the test driver rather than the product; but I
think a little bit of fuzziness at the edges is something we have to accept as
a fact of life. This test has been around for a long time and I don't think
there's sufficient justification here for changing it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 28 December 2014 17:28:52 UTC