[Bug 19597] [QT3TS] prohibit-all-optional-features-2

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19597

--- Comment #11 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> For the test case "prohibit-module-1-s", I would propose to add XQST0059 as
> potential result, as the option declaration may be evaluated after the
> import of the module, thus yielding a "module not found" parsing error (and,
> as far as I have seen, the spec. does not require that the options are
> evaluated in a separate compiler step). As an alternative, the query could
> be modified to point to an existing module.

Personal opinion follows.

The line 

declare option prohibit-feature "module";

means that the implementation must act "... as though the feature were not
implemented... "  I can't see how an implementation which did not implement the
module feature would attempt to resolve a module, and thus it would never raise
XQST0059.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 08:31:17 UTC