- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:13:36 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20547 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Yes, we could include the encoding as an explicit argument. The only question is whether that would spoil the intent of the test. The alternative might be to have two alternate results, one for processors that correctly infer the encoding using implementation-defined heuristics, and one for processors that fall back to UTF-8. (I'm not sure if the spec allows for the possibility that implementation-defined heuristics will be invoked and will give the wrong answer...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2013 20:13:37 UTC