W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2013

[Bug 9063] [XQ31ReqUC] Override parts of a module

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:39:40 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-9063-523-aeVXfXU52b@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9063

Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |adam@exist-db.org

--- Comment #3 from Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org> ---
Being able to independently compile XQuery modules is something that is
incredibly useful in XQuery as it allows you to create systems that operate on
Modules for example EXQuery's RestXQ and eXist-db's SOAP Server, both of these
allow translation to/from XQuery function calls from a host system or language.

If the use-case is that being able to override aspects of a module helps re-use
of code through composition, is there not an argument that the granularity of
the users modules is not fine enough. i.e. they could just break a module into
two modules.

I am not opposed to the capability or idea of overriding aspects of modules, as
long as we can maintain the capability to independently compile modules
somehow.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 09:39:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2013 09:39:42 GMT