W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2013

[Bug 21599] format-number() integer-part grouping overly prescriptive

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:36:13 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-21599-523-nZmpJZMpDW@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21599

--- Comment #4 from Paul J. Lucas <paul@lucasmail.org> ---
> I'm very reluctant to make any changes ...

Do you really mean intransigent?

> there's too much risk of introducing an accidental incompatibility or ambiguity.

My concrete suggestion (which you requested) is pretty much a copy-paste of the
format-integer wording with only the necessary substitutions, e.g., "format
token" became "integer part of the sub-picture."  If the wording for
format-integer() is presumed to be unambiguous, then my suggestion should also
presumably be unambiguous.

As for incompatibility, well, I don't see any since the result is the same.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 April 2013 15:36:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:52 UTC