W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2013

[Bug 21568] Incorrect expected result for FOTS tests function-decl-reserved-function-names-001,function-decl-reserved-function-names-003,...

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:41:00 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-21568-523-ODCj5YtMfe@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
The accepted interpretation of the spec is, I believe, that the constraint

/* xgs: reserved-function-names */

applies only to function calls, not to function declarations, and therefore it
is legal for an unprefixed function declaration to use a reserved function

Personally I think this interpretation is open to challenge, because Appendix
A.3 says normatively "The following names are not allowed as function names in
an unprefixed form" without qualification; but the consensus appears to be that
the constraint was only intended to apply to function calls, and if the intent
had been otherwise, the contraint would have been linked from the appropriate
place in the grammar.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 15:41:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:52 UTC