- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:36:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18401
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-07-25 21:36:24 UTC ---
I think the only reasonable candidate for an optional feature is "higher order
functions" which would include the function() sequenceType syntax, inline
functions, function literals (f#n), partial application, dynamic callling,
functions such as fn:map, and functions such as fn:function-name and
fn:function-lookup.
I have an open mind as to whether making this an optional feature would be a
good idea. I think that before doing so, we would want to see a reasoned
argument from an implementor or from the developers of a significant host
language (e.g. XForms) as to why the feature is unwanted.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 21:36:26 UTC