- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:01:19 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16089
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-02-23 11:01:19 UTC ---
I think the reasoning is:
(a) the equivalent cast expression is an error under
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/#id-cast rule 1
(b) Section 17.1 of F+O states "The semantics of the constructor function "
xs:TYPE(arg) " are identical to the semantics of " arg cast as xs:TYPE? "
But I agree, your argument seems reasonable, that the argument to the
constructor function should be atomized in the same way as for any other
function.
So I think we have a spec issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 11:01:22 UTC