- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:45:37 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13445
Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> 2012-02-10 19:45:34 UTC ---
> Is there any point having test cases with comment-before-versiondecl,
> when the resulting behaviour is implementation-dependent? (Do the
> results tell us anything?)
I agree that these test cases won't tell us anything with regards to our
specification. I would still leave them in the test suite. Every so often there
will be an implementation that hasn't prepared for this situation and ends
abnormally. Leaving these test cases in the test suite will help catch such
omissions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 19:45:38 UTC