W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 10065] [XPath] Rules for matching substitution groups differ from those in formal semantics

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:26:07 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R2SFj-00033L-UJ@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10065

Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2011-09-10 18:26:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I am reopening this bug because the agreed resolution does not appear in the
> current status quo draft of the specification.

I'm confused. The Working Group's internal Working Draft says this:

http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xquery-30/html/xquery-30.html


<quote>
A SchemaElementTest matches a candidate element node if all of the following
conditions are satisfied:

1. The name of the candidate node matches the specified ElementName, or it
matches the name of an element in a substitution group headed by an element
named ElementName and the substituted element is not abstract. Call this
element the substituted element.

2. derives-from( AT, ET ) is true, where AT is the type annotation of the
candidate node and ET is the schema type declared for the substituted element
in the in-scope element declarations.

3. If the the substituted element is not nillable, then the nilled property of
the candidate node is false.
</quote>


Does this not match the decision that was made? If so, in what way? I'm closing
this, please reopen if the internal draft got this wrong.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 18:26:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:15 GMT