W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12535] [DM] Definition of 'tree' missing and apparently non-standard

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:07:56 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QRY2W-0005GQ-1b@jessica.w3.org>

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-05-31 23:07:54 UTC ---
I think it's best to stick to the current model whereby every node belongs to
exactly one tree, and a root node is therefore defined as being a node that has
no parent. If we adopted the alternative definition that every node is the root
of a tree, an awful lot of our terminology would have to change.

(Let's remember that the term comes from botany, not from mathematics. Each
apple in my garden grows on exactly one tree.)

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 23:07:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:46 UTC