- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:07:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12535
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-05-31 23:07:54 UTC ---
I think it's best to stick to the current model whereby every node belongs to
exactly one tree, and a root node is therefore defined as being a node that has
no parent. If we adopted the alternative definition that every node is the root
of a tree, an awful lot of our terminology would have to change.
(Let's remember that the term comes from botany, not from mathematics. Each
apple in my garden grows on exactly one tree.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 23:07:57 UTC