W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12535] [DM] Definition of 'tree' missing and apparently non-standard

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:58:25 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QRRKr-0005Dn-OQ@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12535

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> 2011-05-31 15:58:24 UTC ---
Would the following rewording of the paragraph in question resolve your
concerns?

  Every node is one of the seven kinds of nodes defined in 6 Nodes.
  Nodes form a rooted, directed, connected, acyclic graph (a tree)
  that consists of a single root node plus all the nodes that are
  reachable directly or indirectly from the root node via the
  dm:children, dm:attributes, and dm:namespace-nodes accessors. A
  node can have at most one parent. Nodes have identity (see 2.3
  Node Identity) and every node belongs to exactly one tree.

I think it's very likely that you understand precisely what the Data Model is
trying to describe. If you have specific suggestions for how this terminology
could be improved, I'd be delighted to hear them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 15:58:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:12 GMT